
Does it pay?
When I was a kid, my parents would follow us around the house shutting off lights and mumbling something about money growing on trees. Now that I am a parent, I find myself in that same role. While I have no aspirations of finding that tree money grows on, I have started to wonder if:
- My panic at seeing all the lights on is warranted.
- Keeping all these lights running is really costing me that much money.
- Since I have replaced my burned out lights with CFL (compact fluorescents), is this taking the edge off?
I started crunching the numbers, and this is what i found.
Determining usage
It turns out that the Kill A Watt EZ Electricity Usage Monitor
The gist is, you plug your item into this gizmo, and it calculates how much power is used. This can easily be converted to dollars.
How the electric company figures your bill
The electric company pretty much has a gizmo just like this (but more rugged, and more thoroughly calibrated.) Your bill is based on killowatt hours. This is wattage used by an appliance multiplied by the time that wattage is used. For example:
- A 100 watt bulb, running for ten hours, uses 100 watts x 10 hours / 1000w/kw = 1 killowatt-hour.
- If you look at your electric bill, you will see that they tell you how much you pay per killowatt-hour. First Energy charges me 7.36 cents. So the cost to me to run that 100 watt bulb is 7.36 cents.
Okay, so that number doesn’t seem to warrant too much freaking out.
Checking out my house
I did a quick check on my house, to see what lights get left on most often. Those are: The living room, the kitchen, basement. Just to be fair, I gave decided to estimate the hours that the lights were on when no one was using them. That time was about two hours per day.
This is how it worked out:
| Room | Total Wattage | Cost Per Month |
|---|---|---|
| Living Room | 100W + 100W + 60W = 260W | 260W * 2hours * 30days * .0736 = $1.15 |
| Kitchen | 60W total | 60W * 2hours * 30days * .0736 = 26 cents |
| Basement (all CFL) | 42w + 42w + 20w = 104w | 104w * 2hours * 30days * .0736 = 46 cents |
So, this tells me that if I fret and run around the house turning off lights, I stand to save less than two bucks. If I relax about the lights, I get to settle down a bit, and it only costs me two bucks.
Replacing my lights with CFLs
Compact Flourescent Lights are dropping in price every day. Now, whenever a bulb burns out, I replace it with a CFL. I decided to do a little calculating to see how much this transition saved me over the course of a month.
My house is small. We only have about three rooms being lit at once, and then, only for an average of about 5 hours per day. That number will rise in the winter, but not much. So, let’s see how much it costs me to light my house, assuming those numbers, as opposed to incandescent lighting.
The trick with CFLs is they give you two wattage ratings. One, the wattage rating for the power they use, and the other, the equivalent incandescent wattage. In each room, we have two 26 watt bulbs (100 incandescent watts each) and one 15 watt (60 incandescent watts) bulb. This gives me 260 incandescent watts for the cost of 67 watts.
So, here’s how much it costs to light my house either way, assuming 3 rooms, 260 incandescent watts, 5 hours/day, and 30 days:
| Lighting | Killowat-hours / month | Cost/Month |
|---|---|---|
| Incandescent | 3 * 260W * 5hours * 30days = 117kwH | $8.61 |
| CFL | 3 * 67w * 5hours * 30 days = 30.15kwH | 2.21 |
So, the total savings for each month is $6.41.
Now, if you are in a similar situation, but have not made the transition to CFL yet, you can assume the lights will cost you about $3.20 each. In this case, each month, the cost of two bulbs will be saved. So, in my case, I recouped the cost of the bulbs in five months.
Is it worth it?
From what I understand, all bulbs will be switching to CFL soon, so we will not have a choice. But yes, it seems to be worth it. In order to get an equivalent light, you spend about a quarter of the cost in electricity.
As for shutting off every light in the house as and following people around to do so, no, it’s not worth it. Now that the usage has dropped by three fourths, it is really not worth it.
Now, my electric bill is still about $100 dollars a month. This might justify me buying the Kill A Watt EZ Electricity Usage Monitor to track down the culprit, but at this point, it’s not a good idea for me to be spending money. I have a suspicion it’s the cable box, the tivo, the tv, or some major appliance.
So, remember that wish list , and if I get one, I promise to teach you all how to find what is killing your electric bill.
#1 by Meg from FruWiki on July 20th, 2009
Quote
I agree that it’s appliances that cost you, not so much the light bulbs. Still, why use more electricity than you need, especially if you’re paying for it? It’s not like it costs you anything to get up and turn the light off — except maybe a few calories which most of us could stand to lose. My husband and I try to avoid using lights inside as much as we can and use a single bulb lamp in the evenings instead of the three bulb overheads whenever possible. Even if electricity were free, we’d still do that just to reduce waste — which is the heart of frugality and being green-minded.
Also, being mindful about the lights really made us more mindful about other things like unplugging appliances. I’m sure getting rid of our t.v. altogether really helped our electric bill, as well as hang drying my clothes (though my husband still uses the dryer). We actually got our electric bill down to $40 this spring (used to be hundreds!), but it jumped over $100 extra in June because of the heat here in Florida — and it’s unseasonably warm even for here. We try to keep it around 80-82 during the day, but it still uses a lot of electricity. Our AC should probably be replaced, but it’s still hard to justify the cost right now. And also on that list is our ancient, un-adjustable electric water heater — which we hope to replace with an instant gas water heater some day.
#2 by admin on July 20th, 2009
Quote
@meg – i would guess that this is a good time to mention one of the main reasons i wrote this blog.. we are a family of four. for me, it’s simple to see the benefits of frugality, even if things were free.. but in order for them to stick with the rest of the people in our houses, we have to make them as painless as possible.
otherwise, the natives will revolt..
it seems like teaching people to turn lights off is near impossible.. and i am sure that if my family ever sees these numbers, they will definitely side against me on the issue..
i would love to see a $40 electric bill!
i am going to check now how much the dryer uses.. i will have to estimate the electricity usage based on the wattage rating, but i should be in the ballpark..
thanks!
#3 by Meg from FruWiki on July 20th, 2009
Quote
Yeah, it is tough when you have others in the house. My husband and I don’t have kids, but we’ve had roommates — at one time 3 extra people, plus a boyfriend who might as well have been a roommate. And of course, we were dummies enough to not charge for utilities. It was tough because we didn’t want to seem like control freaks — which we were accused of by at least one roommate. However, considering the person who said it and how “out of control” of her life she is/was, I’ll take that as a compliment. I just wish her parents had taught her to act like a mature adult instead of pampering and enabling her. Being less wasteful is a good habit to learn early on.
#4 by jeff n on July 20th, 2009
Quote
a good exercise.
it’s not about money,
-it’s about the grid’s capacity. and
-it’s about the lifespan of those lights that you’ll be trashing so much more frequently
#5 by Nate on July 21st, 2009
Quote
You can get a Kill A Watt from Amazon.com for under $24 shipped. I wouldn’t splurge for the Kill A Watt EZ unless you have frequent power outages. All it does is multiply to get cost (which you clearly can do) and save cumulative usage across power failures.
If you haven’t, check out “Mr Electricity’s” website (my name links). Don’t be turned off by the ‘old school’ web design, it’s the best site I’ve come across for energy savings. He focuses on the big stuff first, and dispels a lot of common myths.
#6 by admin on July 21st, 2009
Quote
@nate – this sounds like a good idea.. right now, i am at a point where my spending is in a holding pattern.. but i looked at that one, and it looks just as usable..
the only thing i would like to be able to do is hook it up to my dryer, as that is the beast that i would bet uses alot of juice.. it’s an electric model..
#7 by admin on July 21st, 2009
Quote
@jeff.. i wholeheartedly agree with you.. the only issue i have is getting the rest of the family to comply..
THAT is a hard trick..
#8 by Kevin on August 11th, 2009
Quote
Here is Springfield, MO we can pay an extra $5 per 100 kilowatt-hours and they will buy that much energy from a wind farm in Kansas. It is a pretty good deal all around because most of the electricity here comes from coal fired plants. Our basic rate is $0.0291 per kWh. With the extra charge for wind energy the four 26 Watt bulbs in my workspace would cost $1.92 to run continuously for an entire month. I only actually run them for a few hours a day, so they actually cost almost nothing. I’m glad I finally did the math on this. My wife always hassles me about leaving these lights on. Her aquarium pump and filter probably cost more to run. I can’t wait to walk away with the lights on now.
#9 by Moxie on August 29th, 2009
Quote
I’m glad you did the number-crunching on this! I try not to be wasteful on principle, but I’m I don’t have to be absolutely wracked with financial guilt if I do on occasion accidentally leave a light on overnight or while I’m in the other room. Good post!
#10 by Moxie on August 29th, 2009
Quote
I’m glad you did the number-crunching on this! I try not to be wasteful on principle, but I’m glad I don’t have to be absolutely wracked with financial guilt if I do on occasion accidentally leave a light on overnight or while I’m in the other room. Good post!
#11 by Shelly on May 11th, 2011
Quote
Technology has caught up and we can save even more with LED lights.
A 60 watt incandescent is equivalent to a 14 watt CFL which in turn is equivalent to a 6 watt LED:
60W incandescent = 14W CFL = 6W LED
Burntimes are as follows:
* incandescent = 750 hours
* CFL = 8,000 hours
* LED = 50,000 hours minimum
Given that LEDs are typically many times more expensive than their CFL equivalent, their reduced electrical consumption and longer lifespan will easily justify the initial acquisition cost and long term savings.
Give it a try. I’m in the process of converting my household to LEDs
Shelly
Medford Property Management